Morrison Foerster’s MoFo Impact blog provides insights on the latest news, developments, and trends in the impact and social entrepreneurship space. Through MoFo Impact, Morrison Foerster attorneys dedicated to impact investing and social enterprise work offer a real-time assessment of the developments in matters that are shaping the industry. Here, we examine the unique challenges faced by social enterprises and impact investors, including issues related to impact investments, disclosure requirements, hybrid corporate forms, fiduciary duties, and beyond.<h2>ABOUT MORRISON FOERSTER</h2>Morrison Foerster is a leading global law firm that transforms complexity into advantage for its clients. Our clients include some of the largest financial institutions, banks, consulting and accounting firms, and Fortune 100, technology, and life sciences companies. Highlighting the firm’s commitment to client service, leadership in market-changing deals and impact litigation, and values-based culture, Morrison Foerster has been repeatedly recognized as one of the top 10 firms on The American Lawyer’s A-List. Year after year, the firm receives significant recognition from Chambers and The Legal 500 across their various guides, including Global, USA, Asia‑Pacific, Europe, UK, Latin America, and FinTech Legal. Our lawyers passionately care about delivering legal excellence while living our values. Morrison Foerster has a long-standing commitment to creating a culture that respects and celebrates differences, while providing an inclusive environment. The firm has achieved Mansfield Certification Plus since 2018 as a result of successfully reaching at least 30 percent women, communities of color, and LGBTQ+ lawyer representation in a notable number of current leadership roles and committees. The firm also has a long history of commitment to the community and society through providing pro bono legal services, including litigating for civil rights and civil liberties, improving public education and fostering the wellbeing of children, advocating for veterans, promoting international human rights, enforcing the right to asylum, and safeguarding the environment.

Social

Search

Susan (“Suz”) co-chairs the ESG + Sustainability and Social Enterprise + Impact Investing practices. Her practice focuses on late-stage financings, secondaries, and other corporate transactions for investors, such as SoftBank and Temasek, and on investments for some of the top investors dedicated to impact, from “impact first” foundations to family offices to private equity funds. She co-led the drafting group for the first of the new corporate forms (the Social Purpose Corporation in California), has created hybrid/tandem corporate structures and crafted debt and equity instruments that blend impact with traditional financial terms, and has used corporate law to develop creative capital market solutions to pressing environmental problems. She also advises the boards of public and private companies on corporate governance and fiduciary duties as applied to sustainability and climate change.She was named a California Lawyer Attorney of the Year (CLAY) in 2012 and 2016 by Daily Journal and the Most Innovative Lawyer in North America in 2015 by the Financial Times.Leading Business AdvisorA powerhouse negotiator, clients note that “you cannot get a better corporate counsel” and that Suz “understands the big picture, could not be more responsive, and understands the business” (The Legal 500 US). She has extensive experience providing corporate and finance advice to companies and investors in connection with growth equity financings and secondaries, with particular experience in late-stage investments that have come to rival traditional strategic acquisitions in size and significance. Her experience includes leading some of the highest-profile late-stage investments over the past few years, including notable transactions for SoftBank Group (in the two largest private tender offers in history) in its $7.7 billion investment in Uber, $4.4 billion investment in WeWork, further $10 billion investment in WeWork, $1 billion investment in SoFi, and $250 million investment in Kabbage. She has also advised Temasek on its $800 million investment in Verily Life Sciences, Intel on its equity investment in Cloudera, and each of Fortress, TPG Rise, Vision Ridge Partners, Generation Investment Management, and Pontifax AgTech in numerous mid- to late-stage investments in clean technology, sustainability, education, food, and agriculture technology.Social Enterprise and Impact InvestingSuz is the go-to legal resource for social enterprises (for-profit and non-profit companies focused on social or environmental purpose), impact investors (investors interested in social or environmental returns), and mainstream companies developing environmental, social, and corporate governance policies. With deep expertise in the impact investing model, institutional investors exploring the space turn to her for creative solutions and her ability to structure both investments and companies to emphasize impact and returns.She represents a wide range of investors who are focused on impact, from foundations like the Gates Foundation, The Nature Conservancy, and The Rockefeller Foundation, to family offices like Armonia, Cornerstone Capital, Emerson Collective, New Island Capital, and Omidyar Network, to private equity funds like Goldman Sachs, TPG Rise, Vision Ridge Partners, and Generation Investment Management, in their equity investments in companies and projects that are focused on generating impact and returns for investors. She has deep experience and expertise ensuring energy, sustainability, and other investments have positive impact through the use of new corporate forms, hybrid or “tandem” structures with non-profits and for-profits, and alternative debt and equity instruments.Notable work in this space includes the establishment of a tandem structure, The Carbon Endowment, to retire coal assets at scale while securing a revenue stream for community reinvestment and job training in coal communities. Suz also advised on the structuring of Common Sense Growth as an extension of the non-profit Common Sense Media (to invest in companies that address issues related to children, education, and technology), the establishment of a fund for TPG Rise to provide debt financing to Echoing Green fellows, the spin-out of PRX from Public Radio International (to generate new revenue flows up to the non-profit), the establishment of a for-profit joint venture with non-profit Medicines360 (to allow the non-profit to distribute its healthcare products to women in the developing world), and the structuring of a for-profit evergreen fund that allows The Nature Conservancy to aggregate return-seeking and donor capital in order to invest in preserving our natural resources. She has also advised numerous clients on converting to a public benefit corporation or social purpose corporation model (which requires balancing traditional fiduciary duties against a social or environmental purpose), including This American Life, Revolution Foods, Rise Labs, and Beneficial State Bancorp.Suz also regularly advises boards of directors of private and public companies, special committees, and CEOs on corporate governance, particularly the intersection of fiduciary duties with sustainability, and focuses on environmental, social, and governance issues.Unmatched Cleantech and Renewable Energy ExperienceIn addition to founding and chairing the firm’s Social Enterprise and Impact Investing Group, Suz serves as Chair of Morrison & Foerster’s Energy Group and has extensive experience representing start-up to late stage private companies in the clean technology or sustainability space. She provides corporate and finance advice in connection with equity and debt financings, mergers, acquisitions, asset purchases and sales, reorganizations, and joint ventures. She has experience working with renewable energy start-up companies and renewable energy developers in the solar, wind, and biofuels industries. Suz has assisted renewable energy start up companies with raising venture capital and has advised renewable energy developers on project acquisitions.Suz’s representative renewable energy, cleantech, sustainable, and social enterprise clients include Anaergia, Change.org, EDF Renewables, E.ON, Etsy, First Look, OneSun, Planet Labs, Rising Sun Energy, RSF Social Finance, SustainBio, Trelys, Inc., Wikipedia, and Xpansiv.Board Activity and Thought LeadershipMs. Mac Cormac was a founding board member of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), is a member of the board of directors of Business for Social Responsibility (BSR), the Ceres President’s Council, and the Earth Genome Project, and is an advising board member of the Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy’s Strategic Investor Initiative.She has joined the faculty (teaching on the intersection of sustainability and fiduciary duties) at both the Stanford Director’s College and the Northwestern Corporate Counsel Institute and is an adjunct professor at UC Berkeley School of Law, teaching a course on Social Enterprise.

maccormac_susan_blog_150x150.png

mac-cormac_susan_common_640x280.jpg

mac-cormac_susan_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

mac-cormac_susan_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

mac-cormac_susan_social_600x600.jpg

Partner

Susan (“Suz”) co-chairs the ESG + Sustainability and Social Enterprise + Impact Investing practices. Her work focuses on advising innovative sustainable companies and investors, with particular expertise on ensuring investments have positive impact through use of new corporate forms, hybrids, alternative debt and equity instruments and disclosure.

Susan (“Suz”) co-chairs the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Social Enterprise + Impact Investing practices. Her work focuses on advising innovative sustainable companies and investors, with particular expertise on ensuring investments have positive impact through use of new corporate forms, hybrids, alternative debt and equity instruments and disclosure.

<h5 dir="ltr">As Chair of the firm’s Social Enterprise + Impact Investing and Energy + CleanTech practice groups, I find it uniquely fulfilling to help emerging companies and their investors channel great ideas and good intentions into tangible, positive change.</h5>How I Help: I have extensive experience representing startup to late-stage private companies primarily in the clean technology, renewable energy and sustainability space. I counsel on corporate and finance matters in connection with equity and debt financings, mergers, acquisitions, asset purchases and sales, reorganizations, and joint ventures. I’m frequently called upon for my expertise in new corporate forms, hybrid of “tandem” structures with non-profits and for-profits, and alternative debt and equity instruments. I also regularly advise boards of private and public companies, special committees, and CEOs on corporate governance as it relates to sustainability and CSR.Favorite app or tech product: Strava. I love tracking the miles I run each week.Favorite place for client meetings: A walk in the PresidioLife beyond the law: When I’m not preaching to the world about the power of corporate form, I spend my time outside the office with my three young sons. I currently coach my youngest’s little league team. Go Pirates!

Susan Mac Cormac

Alfredo Silva is a partner in the Transactions Department, co-chair of the firm's Social Enterprise and Impact Investing Group, and a member of the ESG Strategy Committee. Alfredo represents companies and investors in a broad range of corporate and securities law matters, with a focus on businesses in the life sciences, agtech and fintech sectors. Alfredo’s practice includes capital markets transactions, venture capital, growth equity and corporate venture financings, tender offers and other secondary offerings, digital token matters, and mergers and acquisitions. Alfredo also helps clients leverage environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors to evaluate risk and opportunities and to invest responsibly in businesses seeking sustainable growth and impact.In his private company practice, Alfredo has served as company or investor counsel in early- and late-stage financings, minority strategic investments and impact investments in dozens of private companies, including representation of SoftBank and SoftBank Vision Fund in financings with a combined value of over $2 billion, Temasek in its $800 million minority investment in Verily Life Sciences, an Alphabet company, and Visa Ventures in strategic fintech investments around the world.In his public company practice, Alfredo counsels issuers on strategic transactions, such as the stock-for-stock merger of Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. with Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp, as well as corporate governance and compliance with the U.S. federal securities laws and stock exchange listing standards, including advising on cutting-edge issues with respect to ESG disclosures and materiality assessments.In addition, Alfredo works extensively with nonprofit organizations, providing advice on fiduciary issues, entity formation, structuring and other corporate matters, and assists small businesses pro bono. He incorporated and continues to advise Illuminate, the nonprofit producer of The Bay Lights, a 25,000 LED sculpture on the western span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, in structuring, corporate governance, and project management matters. Alfredo currently chairs the audit committees of the boards of directors of Eat. Learn. Play. Foundation, a charity founded by four-time NBA champion Stephen Curry and The New York Times bestselling author Ayesha Curry to unleash the potential of every child, and Berkeley Repertory Theatre, an international leader in innovative theater whose shows have won eight Tony Awards, nine Obie Awards and a Pulitzer Prize, among many other honors.Alfredo is recognized by The Recorder as a 2013 Lawyer on the Fast Track, in 2014 was the inaugural recipient of the firm’s Kathi Pugh Award for Pro Bono Service, is a 2017 Lawyers Committee for Legal Diversity Fellow, and was the recipient of the American Bar Association’s 2023 National Public Service Award. Alfredo received his B.S. degree, cum laude with distinction, in Engineering Sciences (Chemical) from Yale College in 2004 and received his J.D. degree from Yale Law School in 2008. Alfredo speaks conversational Spanish and Mandarin Chinese, and spent a year at China’s Tsinghua University researching issues in intellectual property protection on a Fulbright Fellowship.

silva_alfredo_blog_150x150.png

silva_alfredo_common_640x280.jpg

silva_alfredo_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

silva_alfredo_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

silva_alfredo_social_600x600.jpg

Alfredo Silva is co-chair of the firms Social Enterprise + Impact Investing practice and member of the firm’s Pro Bono Committee. He represents public and private companies and investors in a broad range of corporate and securities law matters, as well as nonprofit organizations on entity formation, fiduciary issues, and structuring.

Alfredo B. D. Silva represents public and private technology companies and strategic and financial investors in a broad range of capital markets transactions, early- and late-stage financings, and corporate governance matters in a variety of industries, including Life Sciences, Health Tech, FinTech, and SaaS.

Alfredo Silva is co-chair of the Morrison Foerster Social Enterprise + Impact Investing practice and member of the firm’s Pro Bono Committee. He represents public and private companies and investors in a broad range of corporate and securities law matters, as well as nonprofit organizations on entity formation, fiduciary issues, and structuring.

<h5 dir="ltr">My job is to think creatively and balance competing interests to solve complicated problems, and the end result is that the companies I’m working with are able to raise the capital they need to grow, creating and maintaining jobs for others while bringing great products and services to consumers.</h5>How I help: I represent companies throughout their lifecycles, from entity formation to debt and equity financing to exit alternatives, including initial public offerings and mergers and acquisitions. I also counsel investors in venture financing, late stage / growth equity financing, strategic investments, secondary transactions, and impact investments in private companies in a wide variety of industries. Since I have a background in engineering, I get numbers, and often work closely with executives, finance teams, and financial advisors and analysts to model out complex capital structures, financing scenarios, and liquidity events. In doing so, I help clients analyze what’s possible, understand consequences of various transaction structures, and enhance their economics in deals in value from the tens of millions to the billions of dollars.Favorite app or tech product: I spend a lot of time these days checking Coinbase, seeing how the market reacts to developments in the cryptocurrency and blockchain spaces.Favorite place for client meetings: It’s great when you’re close enough with a client to catch up and talk shop at their house!Life beyond the law: Skiing at Lake Tahoe in the winter, weekends in Dolores Park in the summer, and travel to see family and friends in between.

Alfredo B. D. Silva

Benjamin Fox is a partner in the firm’s San Francisco office and a member of the firm’s Social Enterprise and Impact Investing Group. Benjamin’s practice focuses on the representation of clients in corporate and transactional matters, with a focus on investors and companies dedicated to pursuing social or environmental goals alongside financial returns.Benjamin counsels startup to late-stage private companies and venture capital and private equity investors, as well as family offices, private foundations, and public charities in early-stage and late-stage financings, mergers, acquisitions, asset purchases and sales, joint ventures, and hybrid or “tandem” structuring arrangements between nonprofit and for-profit entities. Benjamin has extensive experience working with investors and companies in the climate technology and infrastructure and sustainability space. He regularly advises clients on creative legal structures with respect to aggregating and deploying capital to maximize impact and returns.Benjamin earned his J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law (Boalt Hall), with a certificate of specialization in both Environmental Law and Energy and Clean Technology Law. At Boalt, he served as an executive editor of Ecology Law Quarterly, a member of the California Law Review, and a judicial extern for the Honorable Edward M. Chen of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Benjamin received the Ellis J. Harmon Prize for best legal writing in Environmental Law and Policy and was a NAPABA Law Foundation Scholarship recipient for commitment to serve the Asian Pacific American community.Prior to law school, Benjamin worked for the U.S. Department of Energy in Beijing, China and spent a year at Taiwan’s Tunghai University researching renewable energy and urban development policy on a Fulbright Fellowship. He earned his B.A. with distinction and highest honors from the University of Michigan.

fox_benjamin_blog_150x150.png

fox_benjamin_common_640x280.jpg

fox_benjamin_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

fox_benjamin_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

fox_benjamin_social_600x600.jpg

Benjamin Fox is a partner in the firm’s San Francisco office and a member of the firm’s Social Enterprise and Impact Investing Group. Benjamin’s practice focuses on the representation of clients in corporate and transactional matters, with a focus on investors and companies dedicated to pursuing social or environmental goals alongside financial returns.

Benjamin Fox is an associate in the Morrison Foerster Corporate Department in the San Francisco office. Benjamin is a member of the firm’s Social Enterprise and Impact Investing and Energy and Clean Technology Groups.

<h5 dir="ltr">I feel fortunate to assist companies and investors focused on tackling our most pressing global environmental and social challenges.</h5>How I help: I provide counsel to companies from formation until exit, including in connection with corporate structure and governance, early- and late-stage equity financings, mergers and acquisitions, and joint ventures.  As a member of our Social Enterprise + Impact Investing Group, I frequently advise clients on the legal tools available to promote mission-driven businesses, including attracting non-profit and for-profit capital, and utilizing hybrid non-profit/for-profit structures and new corporate forms.  I also have a particular expertise in the renewable energy sector and work closely with investors, renewable energy developers and cleantech startups on a wide range of corporate matters.Favorite app or tech product: GuitarTuna. It’s pretty good at tuning my guitar.Favorite place for client meetings: At a baseball game. Fenway Park will always be the best, but other stadiums will suffice.Life beyond the law: Enjoying the great outdoors.

Benjamin Fox

favicon.ico

favicon-16x16.png

favicon-32x32.png

apple-touch-icon.png

MoFo Favicons

Blog - Terms of Use

Blog - Privacy Policy

Blog - Blog Disclaimer

Blog - Attorney Advertising

morrison-foerster-blog-logo.png

Provides a data-driven look at the Federal Circuit.

Federal Circuitry

FEDERAL CIRCUITRY

Brings together legal insights and in-depth analyses on trends and complex issues shaping the global technology industry.

MoFo Tech

MOFO TECH

Equips our clients with the most up-to-date and relevant information on employment and labor law issues.

Employment Law Commentary

EMPLOYMENT LAW COMMENTARY

In-depth analysis of developments and trends impacting government contracting.

Government Contracts Insights Blog

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS INSIGHTS

Provides insights and reports on the most current class actions lawsuits and product liability issues that affect consumer-facing companies.

Class Dismissed Blog

CLASS DISMISSED

Our MoFo Impact blog provides insights and analysis on the latest news, developments, and trends in the impact investing and social entrepreneurship space.

MoFo Impact

  Linkedin

MoFo LinkedIN

MoFo Impact Blog - RSS

Stay Connected

Never miss a post from MoFo Impact. Enter your email below to stay up-to-date.

SUBSCRIBE

Legal and business insights for impact-driven changemakers

Morrison Foerster - Footer

Blogs -  Home Button

Home

Blog - Topics

Resources

Corporate Form

Crowdfunding

Deal Structures

Fiduciary Duties

Foreign Investments

Funding - Financing

IPOs

Measuring

Reporting

Topics

Blog - Editors

Editors

Blog - About

About

Blog - Subscribe

Subscribe

Susan H. Mac Cormac

More

Benjamin T.R. Fox

Climate Links: 5/31/2024

Climate Links: 5/17/2024

Climate Links: 5/10/2024

Climate Links: 5/3/2024

Climate Links: 4/26/2024

LinkedIN

California Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the launch of <a href="https://www.connect2capital.com/partners/california-rebuilding-fund/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">The California Rebuilding Fund</a> (the Fund), a program built to support California’s smallest businesses so they can adapt, reopen, and recover from the effects of COVID-19.The California Rebuilding Fund is a public-private partnership that drives capital from private, philanthropic and public sector resources – including a $25 million anchor commitment and $50 million guarantee allocation from the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (IBank) – to Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs). With this new Fund, California’s CDFIs will be better able to help under-banked small businesses recover and reposition themselves to survive the realities of the COVID-19 marketplace. The Fund will seek to distribute funds equitably across the state.Read the <a href="https://www.mofo.com/resources/news/201120-california-rebuilding-fund.html">full press release</a>.

Susan (Suz) Mac Cormac, San Francisco partner, has extensive experience in corporate law, ESG, social enterprise and impact investing, and venture capital.

Susan H. Mac Cormac | Corporate + ESG Attorney

Firefly Children's Network Merger

Open eHealth Foundation Counseling

arnsbarger_linda_blog_150x150.png

arnsbarger_linda_common_640x280.jpg

arnsbarger_linda_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

arnsbarger_linda_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

arnsbarger_linda_social_600x600.jpg

Of Counsel

Linda Arnsbarger advises nonprofits and businesses on a wide range of issues relating to the regulation of exempt organizations and the unique issues raised in doing business with them.
Ms. Arnsbarger

Linda A. Arnsbarger

Linda Arnsbarger

santos_michael_blog_150x150.png

santos_michael_common_640x280.jpg

santos_michael_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

santos_michael_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

santos_michael_social_600x600.jpg

Associate

Michael Santos is an associate in the San Francisco office of Morrison Foerster and a member of the firm’s Transactions Department. Michael is a member of the firm’s Social Enterprise and Impact Investing Group.

Michael P. Santos

Michael Santos

Morrison & Foerster Spearheads Launch of California Rebuilding Fund

California Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the launch of The California Rebuilding Fund (the Fund), a program built to support California’s smallest busin

Morrison & Foerster Spearheads Launch of California Rebuilding Fund

Suz Mac Cormac, Rufus Pichler, and Otis Littlefield argue that patent licensing is a potentially powerful tool to address climate change in an article authored for Intellectual Property Magazine.“Increasingly, companies with green technology are also focused on monetizing environmental benefits,” the authors wrote. “But monetizing a patent portfolio doesn’t have to be the only goal. All kinds of companies can use licensing agreements to encourage behaviors they value. And one of those values could be promoting the environment. Through creative drafting and strategic enforcement, companies can ensure that their technology is used to help the environment, or at least not degrade it.”Read the <a href="https://media2.mofo.com/v3/assets/blt5775cc69c999c255/blt15498f137df24b77/6273ef68b5ad5f2863c5ad07/201030-patents-save-planet.pdf" target="_self" rel="noopener noreferrer" dir="ltr">full article</a>.

littlefield_otis_blog_150x150.png

littlefield_otis_common_640x280.jpg

littlefield_otis_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

littlefield_otis_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

littlefield_otis_social_600x600.jpg

Senior Of Counsel

Otis focuses his practice on representing life sciences clients, including biotechnology, pharmaceutical, agricultural biotechnology, and medical device companies.
He has deep experience and knowledge

Otis Littlefield Ph.D.

Otis Littlefield

Patents to Save the Planet

Suz Mac Cormac, Rufus Pichler, and Otis Littlefield argue that patent licensing is a potentially powerful tool to address climate change in an article authored 

Patents to Save the Planet

In this episode of Impactful Conversations, Michael Santos, a social enterprise and impact investing associate in Morrison & Foerster’s San Francisco office, interviews Bulbul Gupta, the president and CEO of Pacific Community Ventures (PCV), a Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) fund based in Oakland, California.Listen to the <a href="https://www.mofo.com/resources/video-audio/201007-impactful-conversations-cdfis.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">full podcast</a>.

Impactful Conversations: Discussing Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs)

In this episode of Impactful Conversations, Michael Santos, a social enterprise and impact investing associate in Morrison & Foerster’s San Francisco office, in

Impactful Conversations: Discussing Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs)

In this episode of Impactful Conversations, Susan Mac Cormac, the chair of MoFo’s Energy and Social Enterprise and Impact Investing practices, interviews Andrew Macintosh, the COO and CFO of the March Fund—a tech fund focused on the development of food and health solutions that support the sustainable food supply chain and optimize health outcomes.Andrew speaks to Susan about the March Fund’s identification and measurement of key variables that can drive impact and returns, the role intellectual property plays when the March Fund is choosing companies to invest in, and the advice he has for companies that really want to make an impact in the food space.Listen to the full episode here. <a href="https://www.mofo.com/resources/video-audio/200929-impactful-conversations-food.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.mofo.com/resources/video-audio/200929-impactful-conversations-food.html</a>

Impactful Conversations: A Conversation with Andrew Macintosh at March Fund

In this episode of Impactful Conversations, Susan Mac Cormac, the chair of MoFo’s Energy and Social Enterprise and Impact Investing practices, interviews Andrew

Impactful Conversations: A Conversation with Andrew Macintosh at March Fund

Considering environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors when making an investment is no longer solely the province of “impact-first” investors—those who prioritize social or environmental impact above return on capital—but has become, to one degree or another, the norm among private equity (PE) funds. As the calls from both investors and consumers for companies to integrate ESG considerations into their operations and rethink the way they have done business grow louder, funds are increasingly looking to respond to these concerns and integrate consideration of ESG factors into their investment and portfolio management strategies. This means that even “return-first” funds — those whose primary focus remains return on capital — are seeing advantages to considering ESG factors and synergies in connection with their own investment strategies.Read the full <a href="https://www.mofo.com/resources/insights/200806-esg-mainstream.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">client alert.</a>

ESG Goes Mainstream: How “Return First” PE Funds Can Factor ESG Considerations into Their Investment and Portfolio Management Strategies

Considering environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors when making an investment is no longer solely the province of “impact-first” investors—those who

ESG Goes Mainstream: How “Return First” PE Funds Can Factor ESG Considerations into Their Investment and Portfolio Management Strategies

In August 2013, the Delaware legislature added a new subchapter to the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL), allowing corporations to be formed as, or convert to, a public benefit corporation (PBC).<a name="_ftnref1" href="#_ftn1">[1]</a> A PBC is defined as a for-profit corporation “that is intended to produce a public benefit or public benefits and to operate in a responsible and sustainable manner.” Unlike traditional Delaware corporations, in which directors’ obligation to act in the best interests of the corporation and its shareholders is generally understood to mean maximization of stockholder value, directors of a PBC are required to balance its stated public benefit<a name="_ftnref2" href="#_ftn2">[2]</a> and the best interests of those materially affected by the PBC’s conduct alongside stockholder value in their decision-making.The impact community has viewed the PBC form since its adoption as an important tool to enable pursuit of social missions within the corporate construct. The PBC has also been an important symbolic marker for those social entrepreneurs committed to achieving impact goals and attracting impact-first investors. As investors have become more familiar with PBCs, and in order to promote the use of the form and board service by qualified individuals, the community has encouraged legislators to amend the rules applicable to PBCs to make it easier for corporations to adopt the new form and to clarify provisions around director liability and stockholder derivative litigation.In June 2020, both chambers of the Delaware legislature approved an amendment to the DGCL that will be immediately effective upon signing by the governor and, in addition to various changes applicable to Delaware corporations generally,<a name="_ftnref3" href="#_ftn3">[3]</a> will have the following additional effects on PBCs:<ul><li style="margin-bottom: 1em;">The DGCL currently requires two-thirds stockholder approval for (i) amendments to a certificate of incorporation that convert a conventional corporation into a PBC or convert a PBC into a conventional corporation and (ii) mergers that convert shares of conventional corporations into shares of a PBC or shares of a PBC into shares of conventional corporations. The amendment reduces this requirement from two-thirds to majority stockholder approval, the same standard that applies generally to amendments to a conventional corporation’s certificate of incorporation or merger.</li><li style="margin-bottom: 1em;">The amendment eliminates stockholder appraisal rights for (i) amendments to a certificate of incorporation that convert a conventional corporation into a PBC and (ii) mergers that convert shares of conventional corporations into shares of a PBC, to the extent such appraisal rights are not otherwise required under the DGCL irrespective of the effective PBC conversion.</li><li style="margin-bottom: 1em;">The amendment clarifies that a director will not be considered to have a conflict of interest when balancing stockholder value alongside the PBC’s stated public benefit and the best interests of those materially affected by the PBC’s conduct solely due to the director’s interest in stock of the corporation, except to the extent that such ownership would create a conflict of interest if the corporation were not a PBC. Additionally, absent conflict of interest, any failure on the part of a director to satisfy the balancing requirement will not constitute an act or omission not in good faith for the purposes of limitation of liability or indemnification with respect to such director, unless the PBC’s certificate of incorporation otherwise provides.</li><li style="margin-bottom: 1em;">The DGCL currently allows stockholders of a PBC to bring a derivative lawsuit to enforce the director fiduciary duties noted above. The amendment clarifies that any such derivative lawsuit may not be brought unless the plaintiffs own at least 2% of the PBC’s outstanding shares or, in the case of certain listed companies, shares with a value of at least $2,000,000 if such number is lower.</li></ul>For additional information on social enterprise forms, see <a href="https://www.mofo.com/special-content/impact-investing/">www.mofo.com/impact</a>. <a name="_ftn1" href="#_ftnref1">[1]</a> Delaware’s Public Benefit statute was amended by S.B. 75, effective as of August 1, 2015.<a name="_ftn2" href="#_ftnref2">[2]</a> A PBC’s stated public benefit purpose is built into the certificate of incorporation, and may include “positive effects[s]” such as “artistic, charitable, cultural, economic, educational, environmental, literary, medical, religious, scientific, or technological” in nature.<a name="_ftn3" href="#_ftnref3">[3]</a> The DGCL provisions applicable to Delaware corporations are generally applicable to PBCs as well. The June 2020 amendments, among other things, also (i) authorize a corporation to include in its certificate of incorporation an exculpatory provision that eliminates or limits liability of directors for monetary damages for certain breaches of duty, (ii) clarify the types of events that give rise to the availability of emergency powers and the specific powers that may be exercised during an emergency condition, and (iii) permit a corporation to indemnify persons other than current or former directors or officers if such persons are successful in defending claims brought against them by reason of their conduct associated with the corporation.

Marrone Bio Innovations' Acquisition by Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp

Temasek’s Joint Venture with Bayer

SoftBank Group and SoftBank Vision Fund’s Investment Transactions

Temasek's Investment in Verily Life Sciences and Agtech Space

Intel's Investment in Cloudera

Visa's Strategic Investments in the Fintech Space

Marrone Bio Innovations’ Public Offerings

Ekso Bionics Holdings, Inc.’s Stock and Warrant Financings

Temasek's Investment in Coherus, Inc.

Catalyst Biosciences, Inc. IPO/Reverse Merger and Public Offerings

RH's Public Offerings

InvenSense's Public Offerings

At-the-Market Programs

Marrone Bio Innovation’s Acquisition of Pro Farm and Jet-Ag

SoftBank's Acquisition of Sprint

Novellus' Merger with Lam Research

Shutterfly's Acquisition of Tiny Prints

Alfredo Silva is a partner in the Transactions Department, co-chair of the firm's Social Enterprise and Impact Investing Group, and a member of the ESG Strategy Committee.

DELAWARE LEGISLATURE PASSES AMENDMENT ON PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATIONS

In August 2013, the Delaware legislature added a new subchapter to the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL), allowing corporations to be formed as, or conver

DELAWARE LEGISLATURE PASSES AMENDMENT ON PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATIONS

In this episode of Impactful Conversations, Michael Santos, a social-enterprise- and impact-investing associate in Morrison & Foerster’s San Francisco office, interviews Rodney Foxworth, the CEO of <a href="https://www.commonfuture.co/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Common Future</a>. Based in Oakland, California, Common Future tackles wealth inequality nation-wide by focusing on the needs of communities that have been the most negatively impacted by injustice, extraction, and exploitation.To address the wealth gap, Rodney and Common Future are committed to confronting the structural oppression that leaves many communities out by shifting capital towards community investment.Common Future envisions an economy owned by people of all races and ethnicities. Rodney believes in having communities assume a position “as not just a stakeholder but as a literal shareholder that is able to voice an opinion, has a vote, and is able to influence and determine what types of businesses and enterprises and economic development projects are invested in,” says Rodney. “That is power.”<a href="https://soundcloud.com/user-496742723/impactful-conversations-commonfuture" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Listen to the full podcast</a>.

Impactful Conversations: An Interview with Rodney Foxworth at Common Future

In this episode of Impactful Conversations, Michael Santos, a social-enterprise- and impact-investing associate in Morrison & Foerster’s San Francisco office, i

Impactful Conversations: An Interview with Rodney Foxworth at Common Future

In this episode of Impactful Conversations as a part of MoFo Perspectives, Jesse Finfrock, a San Francisco-based associate in Morrison & Foerster’s Social Enterprise and Impact Investing Group, meets with Ken Doctor, the founder of Lookout Local, to discuss how he has incorporated Lookout Local’s mission into its corporate form in electing to become a Public Benefit Corporation (PBC).A PBC requires balancing the traditional fiduciary duties owed to stockholders with the social or environmental benefit that is written into the corporation’s charter documents. In this case, Lookout Local’s mission is to provide the news and information needs for the local communities it serves. “The main thing I want to do is change the conversation and repopulate these news deserts,” says Ken Doctor, so finding a corporate form that embraced his company’s values was the first step.<a rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" href="https://soundcloud.com/user-496742723/05-12-impactfulconvo-v2">Listen to the full podcast</a>.

Impactful Conversations: An Interview with Ken Doctor at Lookout Local

In this episode of Impactful Conversations as a part of MoFo Perspectives, Jesse Finfrock, a San Francisco-based associate in Morrison & Foerster’s Social Enter

Impactful Conversations: An Interview with Ken Doctor at Lookout Local

As the COVID-19 crisis continues to make capital markets, including venture capital, an uncertain source of financing, founders and boards of impact businesses may increasingly look to M&A and other strategic alternatives to assure their survival. Mergers, business and asset sales, large-scale technology licensing, as well as other strategies should all be on the table. However, founders and boards of impact organizations will be rightly concerned with the ability to maintain their organizations’ missions, following such fundamental transactions. Not only is the ability to stay “on mission” important to the organization for its own sake, but it also adds real value (both pre- and post-transaction) that should be taken into consideration during planning and negotiations in connection with such transactions. In this article, we discuss a number of items that impact organizations should consider at different stages (at the preparatory stage, during negotiations with potential transaction partners, and following the closing of the transaction). It is important to understand at the outset that the relative negotiating leverage of the parties (including access to alternative transactions) can significantly influence the ability to implement the measures described below.<h5>Considerations at Preparatory Stages</h5>Proactively Change Corporate Form Even Before Sales Process Begins (Sweet Pill)In the context of a sale of the company, Delaware law requires the board of directors to conduct a process designed to maximize stockholder value.<a id="_ftnref1" href="#_ftn1">[1]</a> In order to maintain mission lock post-closing, it may be helpful to convert into an entity that allows the board to consider issues other than maximizing stockholder value in connection with, and in anticipation of, the sale of a company.Recently, more public companies have considered changing into social purpose corporations (SPCs), public benefit corporations (PBCs), benefit corporations, or similar forms. Such new corporate forms require a dual profit/mission mandate. Although these are for-profit entities that share many traits with regular corporations, their governance documents (and relevant state law) require adherence to a specific and/or general public purpose. For these corporate forms, in determining what is in the best interests of the corporation and its stockholders, the board of directors may consider things other than maximizing stockholder value. These dual profit/mission mandates may allow an acquirer’s offer to be rejected unless it addresses the specific or general public purpose that is aligned with the target’s purpose. For instance, a board of directors of a PBC may not be required to submit a takeover offer to stockholders for approval if the board does not believe that the buyer will prioritize the public purpose of PBC. However, such entities are not available in all states, and their legal rights and obligations vary from state to state.Conversion into an alternative entity is not without its own risks, all of which need to be considered in such a transformation. For example, stockholders of a traditional corporation are entitled to dissenter’s rights in connection with a conversion into a PBC. In addition, certain states require benefit corporations to have a “benefit director.” A “benefit director” is entitled to bring a “benefit enforcement proceeding” to enforce the general specific public-benefit purpose. Nonetheless, a “benefit director” may have a conflict between their traditional fiduciary duties and their duty to preserve a public purpose. Similarly, some states grant shareholders and, potentially, third parties the right to bring “benefit enforcement proceedings.” This expanded base of potential plaintiffs may increase a company’s exposure to litigation.Diligence/Reverse Diligence:  Confirming That Acquirer Will Be a Good PartnerPreserving mission following closing is desirable in many instances, but it may be particularly important where the transaction will be structured as a merger of equals and the company has mission-driven investors, or in instances where the value of the company is, in large part, based on its mission. In a merger of equals, two businesses are combined, and the former stockholders of each company will hold stock in the combined company. Similarly, a business where the mission is important to attracting and retaining customers will want to ensure mission continuity in order to preserve value following the transaction. Otherwise, following the merger, the activities of the combined company may not align with a mission-driven investor’s investment philosophy, or the combined company may lose customers who were attracted to the mission.To determine whether there is mission alignment and ensure mission continuity, a company considering a business combination should consider reverse due diligence on the counterparty/acquirer. Sending a due-diligence request list to the potential acquirer, which includes questions related to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues, is critical in order to determine whether there is mission alignment. The thoughtfulness and completeness of a party’s responses to such inquiries signals commitment to mission. While many of the responses may be qualitative, it is important to emphasize benchmarking when data is available in order to determine how the counterparty/acquirer compares with others in the industry and other potential counterparties/acquirers in a competitive process. Furthermore, when analyzing supply chains of the counterparty/acquirer, it is important to consider what is being monitored and reported and whether any third-party verifications are available. Where one party does not monitor or report customary metrics or there are no third-party verifications available, companies where mission is important should consider whether there is actually mission alignment between the parties.<h5>Considerations During Negotiations</h5>Entity/Transaction Structure:  To Ensure Mission Success Post-ClosingIf a target company has not yet converted into an alternative entity, the target (or the selling stockholders or members) should consider converting the target company as part of the transaction. Note that benefit corporations, SPCs, and PBCs each require periodic impact reporting, which will enable monitoring of post-closing mission lock. Both the benefit corporation and SPC require that such reporting be made public. While public reporting creates a public-relations incentive and increases the credibility of the commitment to maintain mission lock, private reporting is sufficient for monitoring and enforcing post-closing mission lock. A buyer’s willingness to convert the post-closing company into an alternative entity in connection with the transaction signals their intent to maintain mission.Whether or not the target company is converted, protective provisions can be included in the target company’s charter, or in a stockholders’ agreement, to block the ability to change the target company’s mission. Rollover equity (held by founders or other key sellers) can be given the right to enforce such protective provisions. It should be noted that, at least in traditional corporate forms, in any direct conflict between mission-protective provisions and traditional fiduciary duties, fiduciary duties are likely to prevail. Limited liability companies, with their more contract-based governance structure, could provide additional latitude to preserve mission through governance. One further post-closing governance mechanism to be considered would be the requirement to form an impact committee that is empowered to exercise oversight over mission-related activities. The degree to which such a committee may affect change (particularly when there are trade-offs between bottom line and impact focus) should be considered in light of the conflict in fiduciary duties discussed above. If an impact committee is not formed, parties should consider having one board member with “sustainability” expertise.To the extent that the value of the target company is derived from intellectual property, such intellectual property could be held separately from the acquirer corporate structure, with the continued right to the inbound license at least partially based on mission focus, including ongoing reporting and benchmark achievement requirements.<h5>Considerations for Post-Closing Matters</h5>Enforcing Mission Continuity Post-ClosingOne way to enforce mission post-closing is to provide for the acceleration of payment of contingent consideration, in the case of an earn-out, or a release of escrowed proceeds, if there is a material deviation from the agreed upon mission following closing. This will align an acquirer’s financial interest with the mission, or the acquirer will face an immediate cost. In order to ensure that acceleration is not improperly demanded, acceleration should be tied to measurable metrics and, if available, third-party verifications and certifications (or loss thereof).A requirement for third-party evaluation and/or certification can provide some level of comfort that the acquired entity will continue to pursue its social purpose. Parties should consider whether “B Corp.” certification is appropriate, though such certification will require conversion to a benefit corporation or similar entity. Note that a B Corp. is not a type of legal entity but is a certification promulgated by the non-profit B Lab.<h5>Potential Challenges and Risks</h5>Sellers may meet resistance to any deal terms that limit an acquirer’s governance powers post-closing, especially in a challenging market. A seller may have difficulty in convincing an acquirer that the seller’s mission has value that needs to be protected or, even if the seller can make that case, that such value needs to be protected by post-closing rights granted to selling equity holders. An acquirer may view post-closing, mission-imposed limitations as impeding their ability to operate the business as they see fit and limiting value, so care must be taken to frame these limitations as accretive to value.Although, as discussed above, an acquirer’s offer may be rejected by a board if it does not address the specific or general public purpose that is aligned with the target’s purpose, where there are multiple potential acquirers and one potential acquirer offers substantially more value but is not mission aligned, a board of a PBC may be required to recommend that the company convert into a traditional corporation.  Such conversion would add potential complexity because stockholders in a PBC have dissenter’s rights in connection with a conversion to a traditional corporation.Selecting a new corporate form and implementing a transition can be a complex process, and many of the new corporate forms described above have not been well-tested in state courts. There are dozens of different forms, with significant differences between forms. Even within a particular state’s regime, the laws providing for the new corporate forms can seem to be inconsistent with each other.To the extent sellers are relying on impact-related reporting, either for diligence or post-closing compliance matters, such reporting itself will present its own challenges. Most companies who do report on impact matters are years behind in their reporting. Different corporate forms and certifying authorities require different reporting standards. For public companies, impact reporting needs to be harmonized with public filings.<h5>Conclusion</h5>Market forces following the outbreak of COVID-19 will present challenges to many companies. In these uncertain times, some companies may need, or decide, to pursue strategic alternatives. Mission-driven businesses should consider whether and how to preserve mission in connection with such potential transactions. Companies will need to consider the various stakeholders to craft the right strategic approach to preserve mission. Changes to corporate form, whether before or in connection with a transaction, may assist in preserving mission, but such changes are not without their challenges. The benefits and burdens of increased reporting and complex fiduciary duties must be considered. With the proper structuring and balancing, a company may be able to continue to address the needs of stakeholders, preserve mission, and increase value.<a id="_ftn1" href="#_ftnref1">[1]</a> See Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986).

kalansky_shai_blog_150x150.png

kalansky_shai_common_640x280.jpg

kalansky_shai_heroretina_2700x1160.jpg

kalansky_shai_mobileretina_750x1040.jpg

kalansky_shai_social_600x600.jpg

Shai Kalansky's practice focuses on corporate and transactional matters, including mergers and acquisitions (representing both buyers and sellers), venture capital financings, and a broad range of sec

Shai Kalansky

Maintaining Impact Through M&A

As the COVID-19 crisis continues to make capital markets, including venture capital, an uncertain source of financing, founders and boards of impact businesses 

Maintaining Impact Through M&A

In this special shelter-in-place edition of “Impactful Conversations” podcast, MoFo fund formation lawyer Sean Byrne interviews Buckhill Capital General Partner Henrik Jones about collaborating with MoFo to create a new investment term, the <a href="https://media2.mofo.com/v3/assets/blt5775cc69c999c255/blt3552ffb72677ac42/62731c4823c6cf2a1c3af72d/grunin-prize-schematic.pdf">Carried Interest by Verified Impact Calculations (CIVIC)</a>. The CIVIC links a fund’s carried interest to quantifiable impact metrics, and thus has the potential to create billions of dollars of incentives for institutional investment managers to pursue impact goals alongside financial returns. This project is a finalist for NYU’s Grunin Prize for Social Entrepreneurship.Listen to the <a href="https://www.mofo.com/resources/video-audio/200527-impactful-conversations-henrik-jones.html">full podcast</a>.

Impactful Conversations: An Interview with Henrik Jones at Buckhill Capital

In this special shelter-in-place edition of “Impactful Conversations” podcast, MoFo fund formation lawyer Sean Byrne interviews Buckhill Capital General Partner

Impactful Conversations: An Interview with Henrik Jones at Buckhill Capital